Now that the quest for Olympic gold is over, we can turn our attention to another golden pursuit: the Oscar. Like their Olympic athlete counterparts, those who vie for the ultimate prize on Academy Awards night are hard working, determined and exceptionally talented. As in the Olympics, the field of competition plays a major part in who goes home with the gold. While the quality of the film and acting performance are obviously key factors, winners (and therefore losers) are often determined by which other films and actors happened to be nominated that year. And, like subjectively judged events such as Olympic figure skating, the Academy Awards voting process doesn’t always produce the “right” result.
The list of ‘great ones’ who never won an Oscar is both long and surprising. It includes actors Charlie Chaplin, Buster Keaton, Cary Grant, Claude Rains and Peter O’Toole. And actresses Greta Garbo, Gloria Swanson, Lauren Bacall and Judy Garland. Directors who never got an Oscar include Robert Altman (who will receive an honorary Oscar this year), Hitchcock, Fellini, Truffaut, Renoir, Kubrick and Scorsese. The problem was obviously not talent, but timing.
In no year was timing more significant than in 1939, undoubtedly the greatest year in American film history. While it is hard to argue with the decision to name “Gone With The Wind” best picture, in any other year, any one of the other nominated films could have taken home the big prize. The other films up for best picture that year were “The Wizard of Oz,” John Ford’s classic western “Stagecoach,” “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington,” and the haunting “Wuthering Heights.” Several other outstanding films were not even nominated that year—the classic adventure film “Gunga Din,” “Only Angels Have Wings” with Cary Grant and Jean Arthur, “Destry Rides Again” with feisty saloon singer Marlene Dietrich, and “The Hunchback of Notre Dame” with Charles Laughton’s unforgettably heart wrenching portrayal of Quasimodo.
Vivien Leigh’s Scarlett nabbed best actress that year, leaving Bette Davis ironically less than victorious in “Dark Victory,” and Garbo anything but laughing in the romantic comedy, “Ninotchka.” Robert Donat shocked all by winning best actor for “Goodbye Mr. Chips,” beating out three of Hollywood’s most famous and talented leading men in some of the best performances of their careers: Clark Gable as Rhett Butler, Jimmy Stewart as Jefferson Smith and Laurence Olivier as Heathcliff. Talk about a packed field!
Many times the Academy is asked to choose between entirely different films, with sometimes surprising results. There was “How Green Was My Valley” winning over “Citizen Kane” (1941), “Rocky” over “Taxi Driver” (1976), “Annie Hall” over “Star Wars” (1977), “Ordinary People” over “Raging Bull” (1980), “The English Patient” over “Fargo” (1996) and “Shakespeare in Love” over “Saving Private Ryan” (1998). It hardly seems fair, pitting such different but equally exceptional films against each other. It’s a classic case of apples vs. oranges—like asking us to choose between Michelle Kwan and Bonnie Blair.
Sometimes the problem isn’t a packed field, but a disgraceful mistake, like the Academy’s failure to even nominate Chaplain’s greatest film, “City Lights” (1931), the original “King Kong” (1933), the brilliant Cary Grant—Rosalind Russell newspaper flick “His Girl Friday” (1940), or Hitchcock’s “Rear Window” (1954). And perhaps the worst blunder in the history of film, when the entertaining but frivolous “The Greatest Show on Earth,” won best picture over “High Noon” (1952). It was enough to make Gary Cooper leave town for good, even if he did walk away with the best actor award.
This year is an interesting one, with the best picture nominees having more in common than in recent years. Four of the five films up for the top award are either biopics or based on real life events. As has been the case in recent years, I’ve been slow to see new films, having seen only two of those nominated—“Goodnight, and Good Luck” (terrific) and “Crash” (had some good moments, but a bit too neatly tied up). I suppose when choosing between venturing out into the cold and sitting at home curled up on my couch, I’ll choose home, even with the considerably smaller screen. And, being the old movie buff that I am, it’s likely I’ll watch something filmed in black & white. Unless of course, it’s “Gone With the Wind.”
(This column was originally published on townonline.com March, 2006)
Showing posts with label movies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label movies. Show all posts
Thursday, March 1, 2007
Monday, January 15, 2007
Shiver-Me-Timbers and Summer Movies
Summers are made for simple things—basic food, easy-does-it exercise, mindless movies. With the horrendous heat, I’ve been sticking to quick, cold dinners, like gazpacho soup and pasta salads, and I’m running early in the morning before the really hot stuff kicks in. The summer is a great time to go to the movies, but this year I’ve not seen many, at least none of the ‘true summer sort.’ My husband and I did see Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth,” but with all the talk of floods, droughts, epidemics, killer heat waves, and overall problem of planet survival, it hardly qualifies as a summer feel-good flick (though I do highly recommend it.)
Unlike me, my daughter has been an active participant in the genuine summer movie circuit. Earlier this summer she saw “X-Men: The Last Stand” and “A Prairie Home Companion.” She liked both. A few weeks later, she joined a group of her friends to watch the original “Pirates of the Caribbean: Curse of the Black Pearl” on DVD before heading off to the midnight premier of “Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest.” Though the sequel has received mixed reviews, my daughter thought it was great. Next on her list was “The Devil Wears Prada,” (excellent), “Superman,” (an okay movie made even better by the 3-D version), and then “The Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest”—a second time!
Though I’ve not seen the sequel, I liked the first “Pirates of the Caribbean” film. I agree with swashbuckling movie connoisseurs that Johnny Depp’s Captain Jack Sparrow is the best pirate to sail the seas in decades. His look is pirate-perfect, with his black-rimmed eyes, beaded, braided hair—and beard!—and gold-capped teeth. His wildly bizarre characterization is definitely one of those you-have-to-see-it-to-understand-and-appreciate-it type performances. Yes, Depp makes an utterly charming, though somewhat unconventional pirate.
As an old movie buff, though, I can’t help but drift to the films of the past for my summer swashbuckling fix. Among my favorite pirate movies is the 1935 film “Captain Blood” starring the roguish, dashing Errol Flynn. Sold into slavery, Peter Blood falls in love with the beautiful heroine played by Olivia deHavilland, Flynn’s leading lady in many other films. Flynn’s on-the-beach duel with French pirate Levasseur (Basil Rathbone) is up there with one of the best swordfights ever filmed.
As much as I enjoyed “Captain Blood,” there is one old pirate film I think is even better—“The Sea Hawk.” Before my daughter began her summer-pirate movie marathon, she suggested we watch it again together. A few minutes into the film, with Captain Geoffrey Thorpe (Errol Flynn) leading a raid on the Spanish ship and with Erich Wolfgang Korngold’s magnificent score playing in the background, my daughter reminded me what makes this film so great. It has no dramatic special effects or spectacular stunts. It has no computer-generated character make-up or complicated plot. It does, though, do something that is not always done well in modern films. It tells a great story—simply, perfectly.
The “Sea Hawk” has everything anyone could ever want in a summer pirate movie—action, adventure, romance, political intrigue, not to mention thrilling battles at sea. On the heroic side, there’s Errol Flynn, of course, as the dashing Captain Thorpe, leader of the Sea Hawks, a band of fearless ‘privateers’ who raid Spanish ships, stealing treasure for the good of England. Flora Robson turns in one of the most engaging and believable portrayals of Queen Elizabeth in all of movies. “The Sea Hawk” also has its share of terrific bad guys—old reliable Claude Rains, and Henry Daniell as Lord Wolfingham, with whom Flynn engages in a spectacular (and famous) shadows-on-the-wall sword fight at the end of the film.
As far as summer film recommendations, I’d have to say don’t miss the Al Gore movie. It may be hard to watch, but it is a definite must-see. And though he’s no Jim Carrey, Gore manages to crack a joke or two as he delivers both bad news and his inspirational “we all need to care about this” message. To keep your personal ‘earth in the balance,’ you may want to follow up with a feel-good pirate flick. Whether you favor Captain “savvy” Sparrow or the more traditional Captains Blood or Thorpe, a pirate movie is a great way to spend a lazy summer afternoon.
(This column was originally published on townonline.com July, 2006)
Unlike me, my daughter has been an active participant in the genuine summer movie circuit. Earlier this summer she saw “X-Men: The Last Stand” and “A Prairie Home Companion.” She liked both. A few weeks later, she joined a group of her friends to watch the original “Pirates of the Caribbean: Curse of the Black Pearl” on DVD before heading off to the midnight premier of “Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest.” Though the sequel has received mixed reviews, my daughter thought it was great. Next on her list was “The Devil Wears Prada,” (excellent), “Superman,” (an okay movie made even better by the 3-D version), and then “The Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest”—a second time!
Though I’ve not seen the sequel, I liked the first “Pirates of the Caribbean” film. I agree with swashbuckling movie connoisseurs that Johnny Depp’s Captain Jack Sparrow is the best pirate to sail the seas in decades. His look is pirate-perfect, with his black-rimmed eyes, beaded, braided hair—and beard!—and gold-capped teeth. His wildly bizarre characterization is definitely one of those you-have-to-see-it-to-understand-and-appreciate-it type performances. Yes, Depp makes an utterly charming, though somewhat unconventional pirate.
As an old movie buff, though, I can’t help but drift to the films of the past for my summer swashbuckling fix. Among my favorite pirate movies is the 1935 film “Captain Blood” starring the roguish, dashing Errol Flynn. Sold into slavery, Peter Blood falls in love with the beautiful heroine played by Olivia deHavilland, Flynn’s leading lady in many other films. Flynn’s on-the-beach duel with French pirate Levasseur (Basil Rathbone) is up there with one of the best swordfights ever filmed.
As much as I enjoyed “Captain Blood,” there is one old pirate film I think is even better—“The Sea Hawk.” Before my daughter began her summer-pirate movie marathon, she suggested we watch it again together. A few minutes into the film, with Captain Geoffrey Thorpe (Errol Flynn) leading a raid on the Spanish ship and with Erich Wolfgang Korngold’s magnificent score playing in the background, my daughter reminded me what makes this film so great. It has no dramatic special effects or spectacular stunts. It has no computer-generated character make-up or complicated plot. It does, though, do something that is not always done well in modern films. It tells a great story—simply, perfectly.
The “Sea Hawk” has everything anyone could ever want in a summer pirate movie—action, adventure, romance, political intrigue, not to mention thrilling battles at sea. On the heroic side, there’s Errol Flynn, of course, as the dashing Captain Thorpe, leader of the Sea Hawks, a band of fearless ‘privateers’ who raid Spanish ships, stealing treasure for the good of England. Flora Robson turns in one of the most engaging and believable portrayals of Queen Elizabeth in all of movies. “The Sea Hawk” also has its share of terrific bad guys—old reliable Claude Rains, and Henry Daniell as Lord Wolfingham, with whom Flynn engages in a spectacular (and famous) shadows-on-the-wall sword fight at the end of the film.
As far as summer film recommendations, I’d have to say don’t miss the Al Gore movie. It may be hard to watch, but it is a definite must-see. And though he’s no Jim Carrey, Gore manages to crack a joke or two as he delivers both bad news and his inspirational “we all need to care about this” message. To keep your personal ‘earth in the balance,’ you may want to follow up with a feel-good pirate flick. Whether you favor Captain “savvy” Sparrow or the more traditional Captains Blood or Thorpe, a pirate movie is a great way to spend a lazy summer afternoon.
(This column was originally published on townonline.com July, 2006)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
